Skip to main content

Alpers opposes DFG stocking proposal

October 28, 2010

Local aquaculturist Tim Alpers, seen here planting his trophy trout in area waters, is concerned that a new DFG policy could have negative economic effects for the region. The DFG says the new policy would have no effect on angling in the Eastern Sierra. Photo by Mike Gervais

The California Department of Fish and Game will meet in November to vote on a controversial measure that some say will impact private fish stocking operations throughout the Eastern Sierra.
Specifically, the measure would require any entity in the state that stocks its waters from a private or state-run fishery to pay for an environmental study to ensure the fish do not interfere with, or cause harm to, one of 87 species under concern.
While the DFG says Eastern Sierra operations will not be impacted, local fish farmers aren’t convinced.
Tim Alpers, local fishing advocate and aqua-farmer of the prized rainbow trout that bear his last name, has sent out letters stating that the measure could stifle next year’s planting season, affecting all of Inyo and Mono counties as well as the entire state.
Alpers says the measure would require concessionaires and others utilizing stocked fish to pay for an environmental impact report before stocking can resume.
“Currently there is no such company or biologist in the area qualified to do these EIRs,” Alpers wrote.
However, the person who presented the measure to the DFG board says it will have no effect on local waters.
Curtis Milliron, local senior biologist for DFG, gave the findings and made the request to the DFG Commission in San Diego in October.
He said the request is to require the removal of stocking permits exemptions for 37 counties, located mostly in Central California.
He explained that concessionaires and others in Inyo and Mono have always paid for stocking permits. He said “virtually all concessionaires” were issued permits this year, just prior to the Opener when DFG was required, by court order, to survey area waters prior to stocking.
Through the decision of a 2007 lawsuit filed against DFG, the agency had to complete EIRs on waters before stocking would be permitted. The DFG was frantically approving as many accessible waters as possible days before the Opener. Alpers said that he and other aquaculturists think the ruling could and should be “summarily dismissed.” Alpers said that the EIRs, done just prior to the 2010 Opener “had a serious impact on the Mono economy.” Alpers said that Silver Lake along the June Lake Loop was not open for angling until June 15.
He said that concessionaires and other recreational water managers must “do our diligence so we don’t get blind-sided like we did last year.”
The DFG itself will be coming for up some analysis.
On Sept. 28, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation that will require a scrutiny of the organization more than 60 years old. According to the Treanor Report, the DFG lacks some comprehensive organization. This includes a stronger role for DFG Commissioners and definitions of responsibilities.
“For instance, the Commission regulates the take of herring, lobster and sea urchins but not fisheries landing fees,” the report states. “This lack of comprehensive authority has complicated implementation of fiscal accountability and ecosystem-based management.”
To read the complete Treanor report, go to For more information about concessionaires and their legal battle against the DFG and the new EIR permits, go to
The DFG Commission will vote on the regulation at its next meeting in Folsom on Nov. 17 and 18.

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes